There are four situations that affect wellness in the United States.
? Bad luck (if you were ever healthy, it has nothing to do with your state of health.)
? Infection (virus, bacteria, fungi or parasite.)
? Injury or accident.
? Degenerative disease (the gradual decline of your overall feeling of wellbeing.)
Sickness is not the normal state for the body. The body would rather be healthy and, it is fully capable of achieving and maintaining the preferred state ? healthy.
People Should be Concerned When they Experience a Decline in their Wellbeing.
Many people do not know they have an option - accepting decline as part of aging.
Other people expect someone else to be responsible.
? Experience the elation that a little piece of paper can be exchanged at the pharmacy for something to fix their complaint.
? Accept the bothersome and sometimes dangerous side effects.
? Make a rest-of-their-life commitment to the little piece of paper.
? Experience the disappointment when nothing changes or something else pops up.
? Repeat the cycle, over, over and over until all of the little pieces of paper are taking control of their lives.
? Accept the hopelessness of more little pieces of paper and declining health.
Some people know they have an option.
? Accept the responsibility for their own wellbeing.
? Recognize it is easier to invest in health than to pay for illness.
? Accept that in order to change the way things are ? they need to change some of the things they do.
? Become confident that, given the proper nutrients, care and enough time, the body can and will repair itself.
? Make reasonable choices that help them experience the joy of health.
There are Simple Ways to Understand These Choices.
The first approach is doing nothing. This approach accepts the decline in wellbeing as inevitable, condemning sufferers for the remainder of their life. Frankly, not a very appealing prospect.
The second appro! ach is r eactive. This approach is effective when there is a definitive cause ? a beginning and an end. It involves someone asking the question: What brings you in today?. Depending on your answer, you will receive a service. In the case of certain infections, injury or accident the intervention stops the decline attributable to the complaint which provides the body the time it needs to react to the situation.
?It isn?t the gun shot that kills you, it is your body?s inability to react to the change of circumstance.? best describes this approach. E.R. personnel stop the bleeding, stabilize the victim, then wait for the damage to heal.
Ideally, the reactive approach should have a beginning and an end. Kill a bacteria with an antibiotic ? wait for the body to heal. Repair an injury ? wait for the body to heal. Suture the wound ? wait for the body to heal.
When the cause is less clear, the reactive approach addresses the complaint - it becomes an intervention without an end. This limitation of the reactive approach contributes to frustration and a sense of hopelessness that many people experience when they are trapped in the reactive approach.
The third approach is proactive.
This approach is grounded in a tenet that the human body requires a modicum of care and nutrition to produce or replace the things that sustain it; that deficiencies in the nutritional complex contribute to a gradual decline in general function, the integrity of substances, structures and tissues that are being produced or replaced. Further, besides the general malaise, this decline negatively affects the body?s ability to respond to incidental circumstances such as infection, accidents and injury.
The proactive approach may be effective prophylactically, to sustain the healthy body, when there is no satisfactory finding of a definitive cause or when the reactive approach presents an unsatisfactory outcome. The subject examines past circumstances, various daily actions and choices that may be affecting overall! wellbei ng, making appropriate changes to address the impediments while creating a protocol to change the unsatisfactory outcome. Many subjects find this approach to be hopeful because of their positive involvement in the process and the experiential outcomes. Others, unfortunately, are overwhelmed with the responsibility.
Sadly, the cost of insurance premiums is expanding the number of people who choose to do nothing. In the end, this will certainly exacerbate the consequences of neglect and elevate the level of profound intervention.
The Medical Establishment prefers that people elect to follow the status quo ? accept the reactive approach as the means to address their issues of wellbeing. National attention, focusing on the dangers and recalls of several mainstay drugs, has the public examining the wisdom of total reliance on the reactive approach to health and frankly, questioning the wisdom of that reliance.
The sensibility of proactive approach for wellbeing offers a real alternative. It provides those who cannot afford the price of admission for the reactive approach an affordable means to address wellbeing. Also, it offers people who have become frustrated and disenchanted or other people who elect to take control of their own destiny, the opportunity to make a positive contribution to their wellbeing.
Written by Frank A. Lucas The author is the Founder and President of NUPRO and The Radiant Health Club. The Club is dedicated to the millions of people who have or will accept the responsibility for their own wellbeing. Relying on publications, scientific research and documented historical uses, The Radiant Health Club provides its members with a fast, easy way to right their bodies supported by affordable, effective nutraceutical supplements to help achieve member objectives.
Submitted by John Jarvis
http://www.radianthealthclub.com/?janajarvis
http://www.parasitesinhumans.com
http://www.nonijuiceforhealth.com
http://www.nonijuice911.com/publichtml
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น